Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Limits (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Extreme Limits
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES; I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes; no suitable or reliable sources or reviews were found to pass WP:NEXIST in a WP:BEFORE. The Film Creator (talk) 01:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete This is not looking like a notable film. Doesn’t realise policies for films or the generic policy of WP:GNG. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete No references Rlink2 (talk) 17:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.