Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extreme Rules (2012)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per point 2. this comment and this comment suggest that the nominations are to disrupt process, as a way to "get back" at wikipedia for recent MMA nominations and deletions. Note to WP:PW, simply being a PPV does not automatically qualify an event as notable, this discussion may come back up in the future. --kelapstick(bainuu) 05:50, 8 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Extreme Rules (2012)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article is not notable enough for wikipedia. Glock17gen4 (talk) 02:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep first of all the PPV of wrestling are the center of the business so they are notable in general. This one is special notable for the changes to the usually networking of WWE and the first match if brick lesnar after his return.--Nakurio (talk) 04:48, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep. This article, along with every other WWE pay-per-view article, is highly notable. It appears we may have someone who just doesn't like pro wrestling. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged or deleted from what I've read. Considering this was Lesnar's return it passes musters better than most articles in the realm of professional wrestling that could ever be revenge-nommed. Bad form. Papacha (talk) 05:40, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.