Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Extremely Decent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Nakon 02:53, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Extremely Decent

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. I can't find any evidence of notability Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 00:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete A YouTube comedy effort lacking coverage in independent, reliable sources. Not notable. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  06:01, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete With the non proper noun phrase "extremely decent" rather common in general news reports, one might need to add extra filters to sort out the unrelated results. But no reliable sources found with "Extremely Decent +YouTube".  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 10:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep, was easily able to find secondary source coverage in multiple references including: The Huffington Post (2014), Hypebot.com, TIME magazine -- where they featured in The 5 Best Facebook Parodies, Variety, Marketing Land, CIO.com, The Huffington Post (2013), Complex.com, Digital Trends, The Stir, and also this source in German language. Thank you, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:46, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG. In addition to Cirt's links, here is coverage in The Daily Dot. Carrite (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG. - Our goal is to create a web-based, free content encyclopedia of all branches of knowledge....we are not hardup for space. An encyclopedia is, by its nature, a tertiary source that provides a survey of information already the subject of publication in the wider world. lol fun rant!!! -- Moxy (talk) 18:06, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Question Can someone point to a single reliable source that gives significant coverage to Extremely Decent? All I see is passing mentions in the context of very brief articles recommending funny videos. What am I missing? Cullen328  Let's discuss it  21:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment-: I just checked through the sources provided above and I can't see the subject of this article as the subject of the sources. All I can see are passing mention. None of the sources discussed the subject in detail. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 21:55, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment-: I just checked the source suggested by, above, namely, The Daily Dot. Thank you, , for helpfully doing some diligence and recommending yet another source. Most appreciated, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 22:12, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Reply Here's the totality of the coverage of the topic in that source: "L.A. sketch comedy troupe Extremely Decent feels your pain, and translated it to video." Do you really see that as significant coverage, ? I don't. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  22:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Neither do I. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 00:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.