Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EyeBeam (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Sjakkalle (Check!)  19:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

EyeBeam (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable software item. Fails notability criteria. Mythpage88 (talk) 08:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per, , and . SL93 (talk) 20:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Only the second link constitutes "significant coverage", as the third doesn't meet reliability guidelines... Mythpage88 (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 00:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment – Try this search too:
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Reuters says that's the flagship product of a notable company.  Google news archive search for their name and the name of their company, and you get over a hundred results  but I can't get it to filter out the press releases so its hard to sort through all of them.  Seems like a notable product though.   D r e a m Focus  19:28, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.