Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eye of Agamotto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Antigng (talk) 03:23, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Eye of Agamotto

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This may well be important inside the particular fictional world, but there is no secondary sourcing for this article, and whatever I saw in the less fictional world of Google was either primary stuff or fan stuff--nothing we could call in-depth discussion in reliable sources. I'll settle for a redirect, of course. Drmies (talk) 15:23, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. A core artefact in the Doctor Strange mythos, and thus both mentioned and discussed in all evaluations of the Ditko/Lee reimagining of sorcery; the article is over-stuffed with in-universe detail and under-referenced, but I have added three sample references to it in independent discussions of the material. Also Cat Yronwode's prominence in the field should be noted in weighting the reference to her that was already present. Yngvadottir (talk) 18:30, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable enough for it's own article, it's been in the comics since 1963, has appeared in direct-to-TV films and animated movies, and TV shows (including the 1994 Spider-Man show, The Super Hero Squad Show, and Doctor Strange: The Sorcerer Supreme). That definitely qualifies it for notability, and Yngvadottir has already added references. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 23:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:29, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  13:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Covered in detail in sources such as Encyclopedia of Comic Books and Graphic Novels and American Comics, Literary Theory, and Religion. Andrew D. (talk) 17:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge Not strong enough to have its own article; but I can see it helping out a different article as a support item, more or less. The Undead Never Die (talk) 01:06, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - No good merge candidate, and adding a more detailed description of the object on every page that links to it doesn't seem useful. Argento Surfer (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.