Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eye poke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Snow Keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Eye poke

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. GregJackP  Boomer!   14:27, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Its notable enough to have its own article just like other fighting moves. As the section I added last week explains, its been used in many notable fighting events, by losing fighters who wanted to end the fight with a "no decision".  Such a serious problem some are requiring webbed gloves to prevent this from happening.  Other information about it is available and has also been referenced.   D r e a m Focus  15:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep On close inspection, there seems to be no OR or Synth in this quality article whatsover. Just as one would exspect - it was written by a team of our finest writers - Dream, NorthAmerica and the Colonel himself! FeydHuxtable (talk) 17:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep This article seems to have independent sources and I don't believe it's OR. Papaursa (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Between martial arts and its use in slapstick comedy, it is sufficiently notable; indeed the former is notable in itself though less sure about the latter usage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:SNOW. --131.123.124.42 (talk) 20:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.