Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyebeam Atelier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Eyebeam Atelier
The result was Keep. Agent 86 19:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Fails WP:N, is basically an ad. Was deleted via prod and then recreated almost word-for-word by the original article creator, so I'm bringing it here. Aaron 18:17, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral This does somewhat sound like an advertisement, but it does have a claim to notability through all the resident artists that it has. Diez2 18:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Whether or not the text reads like an ad, this place is of major importance in the digital arts scene. How about changing the text instead of deleting the entry?  I created this entry originally because there are very few places in the United States that host and promote interactive media arts.  Eyebeam is one of the most notable institutions in that regard.  Do some work and make the entry better, please, instead of removing it all-together. -JustinHall 20:22, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * okay I put in some time on this page, two article citations, a category, other similar institutions, redacted non-necessary info. Now I think it's even more Wikipedia worthy! -JustinHall 19:37, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep But it needs a ton of work. Eyebeam is notable as being one of the few U.S. based institutions dedicated to New media art/Computer art, two categories that need to be expanded anyway. However, as written, it cites no references for its notability and the history section is not neutral. It will need an extensive rewrite and citations. DISCLOSURE: I currently do work with Eyebeam. --Yatta 18:27, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * — Yatta (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * - Except that I've only made minor edits to this article, mostly wikifying links at that. --Yatta 19:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.