Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyenine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Singu larity  09:15, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Eyenine

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Might be a big star one day, but for now fails WP:MUSIC sparkl!sm hey! 09:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Neutral/delete This is a complex one, but it seems to me a member of 'Eyenine' wrote this article for recognition and since they have not released an article yet etc.... I'm afriad it doesn't meet the standards of WP:MUSIC. cf38 talk  09:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, but I would expect this article may go ahead if they become notable (possibly in the near future)  Pump me  up  10:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not appear to meet any of the criteria in WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil (talk) 10:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong Delete Read it closely. The birthdate.  The post-session "snack".  Me smells a hoax.  WP:BLP or WP:HOAX  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.39.228 (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Gtstricky Talk or C 14:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per above, and as unsourced WP:OR. Cirt (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC).
 * Strong Delete -this reads "hoax" mixed with db-band. Greswik (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions.   -- the wub  "?!"  19:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.