Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyeprint Verification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 04:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Eyeprint Verification

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not meet WP:NSOFT.

Note, article was contributed by someone whose username is the same as the company's name, but has been rewritten by me. &mdash; rybec   02:00, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

I disagree, It does follow WP:NSOFT, it is being tried as an alternative to passports.JDgeek1729 (talk) 03:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * JDgeek1729's version of the article was about iris recognition, which is is a widely-used technique that is distinct from Eyeprint Verification. As explained in the original version of the article, the latter is "exclusive" to one company, Eyeverify, and is based on scanning the whites of the eyes, not the irises. &mdash; rybec   03:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak delete for now, likely WP:TOOSOON. I will admit to being somewhat biased against the article in any form because of the bad taste left in my mouth by the original version.  It will be a few weeks or months before I'm neutral towards this topic.  The closing administrator should take my lack of objectivity into account. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  04:13, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Needs to be expanded on and have more sources, otherwise delete.TomKoenig (talk) 04:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:34, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:35, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete too soon. Policy is to not include articles on speculation only. Once something is announced and covered by enough press to be notable, then perhaps try again. Could userify in the meanwhile. W Nowicki (talk) 18:38, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable software, per WP:SPECULATION and WP:TOOSOON.  Alex discussion ★ 20:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.