Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes Of Munity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deletion. WWGB (talk) 23:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Eyes Of Munity

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Non-notable band, all references are self-published sources, fails WP:BAND. Disputed speedy. WWGB (talk) 12:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 12:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nom. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  13:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 14:35, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Too soon. Needs better referencing - and that will only be possible with more performances and recording so that there is independent coverage. I wish the band good luck (needed in the music business...) and hope to see an article again. (No, not next week...) Peridon (talk) 14:57, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete No claim to significance made. --Triwbe (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources, and no serious claim of significance. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BAND. Unsigned band that has yet to release an album; no significant coverage.  Erpert  Who is this guy? 17:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.