Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes Wide Open (2013 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Eyes Wide Open (2013 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable. No coverage at Google News or Google Books. No significant coverage from reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Doesn't meet any of the more specific criteria at WP:NOTFILM. No major awards, no indication of mainstream critical reviews. The only references are IMDb and a church newsletter. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, I could not find any coverage from independent RSsPincrete (talk) 18:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:51, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet WP:NFF. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * director:
 * production:


 * Delete per suffering the same problems as do many (not all) short films... lack of coverage. If this film ever gains notability, the article can be WP:REFUNDED and sourced. Until then, nope.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 04:25, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.