Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes of the Oracle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete both. WP:CSD JohnCD (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Eyes of the Oracle

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The article is an album of a band that used to have a wikipedia article that has since been deleted. The article is poorly sourced and was released through a label that doesn't have its own article, either. By the way, it is notable to point out that I originally created this article, back when I was a wikipedia newbie.

I am also nominating this article because of the same reasons mentioned above; this album was released by the same band and has the same problems attributed to it; I also created this article originally:

Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete both - pretty straightforward. Per precedent in the WP:ALBUMS project, if the band is not notable, and this band's article has been deleted for that reason, then by extension the albums are not notable. Also, kudos to Backtable for cleaning up your own newbie enthusiasm. It happens to all of us! D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 03:02, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the input and the kudos. I was definitely a wikipedia newbie back then and am glad that I don't make articles like that anymore. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 04:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:A9 both of them.  TheWeak Willed   (T * G) 18:41, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.