Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes only

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS dbenbenn | talk 04:52, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC) 1 vote to keep, 1 vote to delete.

Eyes only
Self-promoting vandal. RHaworth 19:35, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
 * I doubt that it is self-promoting. The Eyes Only referred to here is a character out of Dark Angel.  If that character has managed to change Wikipedia from the comfort of his own fictional universe, then that's a heck of a hack that probably deserves mention in Wikipedia.  I'd suggest Merge with Dark Angel, were it not that there is no actual content worth keeping on this page.  Delete. Uncle G 23:17, 2005 Jan 7 (UTC)
 * I've made it a redirect to classified information.--Samuel J. Howard 23:28, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep SJH's redirect --foobaz&middot;&#9998; 23:54, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Since the page has already been changed to a redirect there's little point in voting, however if the original article was about the character Eyes Only from Dark Angel I hope any useful content was merged with that show's article. 23skidoo 06:31, 9 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * As I said, there wasn't any to merge. History is your friend. (-: Uncle G 06:11, 2005 Jan 10 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.