Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyes only (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Fastily has speedied it already —Tom Morris (talk) 10:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Eyes only
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Flagrant spam - article was previously merged to Dark Angel and then changed back. It was a tenuous redirect anyhow, so suggest deleting. Sorry, I am not clever enough to know how to Speedy it. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant advertising. J I P  &#124; Talk 07:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I have marked this page for speedy deletion as unambiguous advertising & copyright violation. Please note that there is a serperate article at Eyes Only (capital "0") which is a disambiguation page, containing the link to Dark Angel, a link to classified information, and a link to Eyes only.  This redirect page will need to be edited if (more likely when) Eyes only is deleted. Millermk90 (talk) 07:45, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.