Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyesafe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:41, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Eyesafe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Despite the long reference list, I don't think this company actually meets WP:CORP. Most of the references either a) don't mention the company, b) are from the company's own website, or c) aren't reliable sources. There's one CNET source that seems OK, but other than that, this feels like promotional spam. PianoDan (talk) 18:59, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology,  and Minnesota.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP. Even if it can be established to be notable WP:TNT is a better option. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:10, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP --ArcticSnowWind (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.