Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eylem Şenkal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. It pains me slightly to close this as NC as it is a relatively-unsourced BLP, and on this basis, it probably needs improving fairly speedily to avoid a renomination in the coming months. Daniel (talk) 10:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Eylem Şenkal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability and no independent coverage. Keivan.f Talk 21:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment I found a few sources:, , , , , . According to the article (which needs to be updated), she played in Fenerbahçe (also confirmed by the sources). The question is, did she play in the main team in Fenerbahçe in Turkish Women's Volleyball League or in a lower league? Looking at WP:NSPORT, there is no criteria for Volleyball players, so we have to make up our own. Also with the amount of sources she might meet WP:ENT. ~Styyx   Talk? ^-^  07:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems that she was in a lower league, otherwise there would have been much more coverage of her work and activities. Her so-called career as a model is also not enough to make her prominent, because she is not a well-known figure in the Turkish fashion industry. I'll look forward to what other users have to say about her Volleyball career though; maybe she has had some achievements but I doubt it. Keivan.f  Talk 22:05, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:34, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep: The sources in the article are not IS RS with SIGCOV, but the sources found are interesting. I don't believe individually they amount to SIGCOV, but WP:BASIC allows, "If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability". I think this makes it squeek past BASIC. I do not believe NSPORT (or any other SNG) would be any help here. The article is in a very poor state.  // Timothy :: talk  03:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.