Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyuboglu Koleji

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep.

I count 13 clear "delete" votes and 19 valid "keep" votes. 2 votes were too ambiguous to call and 3 votes were discounted as either anonymous or trollish. Rossami (talk) 08:09, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Eyuboglu high school
Turkish IB high school with 'various facilities'. Radiant! 13:34, Feb 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 00:17, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Even I, an ardent fan of school articles, can find little reason to keep this one. Delete unless verifiability can be found A link is good enough. GRider is right about the International Baccalaureate making it really quite worth an article - David Gerard 14:00, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Jonathunder 22:00, 2005 Feb 27 (UTC)
 * When David Gerard says delete on a school article, there's no other argument needed. Delete. Jayjg (talk)  21:46, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I've changed my mind ;-) - David Gerard 14:04, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Indrian 04:42, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and allow for organic growth. This Turkish school offers the International Baccalaureate which makes it distinctively noteworthy.  GRider\talk 01:02, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Move to Eyuboglu High School, -- R yan! |  Talk  11:35, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)


 * Notice to reviewing administrator: There was an attempt to vote stack on this article. See GRider's contributions.  Votes beyond this point need to be reviewed carefully and considered carefully. -- AllyUnion (talk) 02:45, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Users must consider all policies and former consensus before commenting for consensus: Please note, Deletion policy, is not the only policy to consider.
 * Votes for deletion/Precedents
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * What's in, what's out

Considerations should also be made to the following as well:
 * Google test
 * Importance

Users should remember that the Wikipedia is not an experiment in democracy. -- AllyUnion (talk) 02:45, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Many, many schools have IB programs. In my state there's probably about one per county. Gamaliel 20:01, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Notice to AllyUnion: Seeing as I'm not a newcomer, bite me. My vote stands and I thank G-Rider for bringing it to my attention!  I almost missed this one.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 03:15, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep but expand.--BaronLarf 19:27, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Deletioncruft. I've categorised it to Turkey. Categorising such articles to improve their chances of evolving is a better use of time than nominating them for deletion. Wincoote 19:57, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable school. Gamaliel 20:01, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Single lines about unremarkable schools are unusable, uninformative, and a hindrance. This is not a Yellow Pages, and being IB is not that remarkable.  I taught at an IB school, went to the conferences, heard the sales pitches.  It's a good program, but by itself it doesn't make a school a vital entry to an encyclopedia.  Geogre 20:02, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but expand.--Oarias 21:34, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand.Drw25 21:36, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as I always say on articles on these matters. Non-notable (I've corrected the tally to 5 to 6 in favor of deleting) --Neigel von Teighen 21:39, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, BEEFSTEW score 1. (And just delete the tally next time.  See here.) &mdash;Korath (Talk) 22:33, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, or meet your maker. RaD Man (talk) 22:38, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. --L33tminion | (talk) 22:45, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, high schools and beyond are inherently encyclopedic (and I shan't get started on all the video game nano-cruft that lurks around here). Wyss 23:01, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Has potential to become encyclopedic. --Andylkl 23:33, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep all high schools with "various facilities", especially twin observatories. Kappa 00:54, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Interesting school stub, wikipedia is not paper. --ShaunMacPherson 01:44, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Very notable. -CunningLinguist 02:59, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough to me. - Mailer Diablo 12:19, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. JuntungWu 12:53, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. high schools are notable RustyCale 13:30, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think schools are inherently notable. Further, "notability" is not listed in Deletion policy (even though I wish it were, and have tried to include it), so isn't grounds for deletion anyway. Dan100 17:52, Mar 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * 'keep' Yuckfoo 23:07, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Another time-wasting deletioncruft nomination.--Centauri 23:32, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. School. LukeSurl 23:39, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 *  KEEP  all REAL places -RickK^h^h^h^h^h. Schools are inherantly notable and this belongs on Wiki.  ALKIVAR &trade;[[Image:Radioactive.svg|18px|]] 03:43, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: In regards to claims of vote-stacking, their are large amounts of people who beleive well-written articles for schools are inherently notable. Merely bringing an article to someones attention is no more votestacking than providing a link for someone is. If you'll notice, GRider's contributions were far and wide and not concentrated on any bloc or mailing list group. Speaking for myself, I evaluated the article and voted to keep it out of sincere belief that it deserved to be kept and not out of any votestacking motivation. I have faith that the majority of the other voters did as well. Thank you for your time. -CunningLinguist 03:56, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: In defence of GRider, I agree with what CunningLinguist has said. --Andylkl 04:47, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * 'comment: echo what cunninglinguist said as well> Yuckfoo 23:26, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable. --Carnildo 05:05, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - SimonP 17:47, Mar 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Interesting. Potential for growth. Useful link. Notable in having the baccalaureate. --cfp 18:26, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a real place, Mark Richards 21:01, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * As per Geogre Delete. Uncle G 16:51, 2005 Mar 9 (UTC)
 * Delete. WIth regard to the international baccalaureate, 1,468 schools offer this program, according to the IBO, including about 500 in the U. S. It's not unique or rare. It is not a college degree or even advanced placement. It is a "pre-university course of study that leads to examinations... [which] has earned a reputation for rigorous assessment, giving IB diploma holders access to the world’s leading universities." Those interested in the program are well served by the complete and up-to-date information available at the IBO website, particularly the IBO World Schools Directory. Wikipedia is not a directory. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:41, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * CommentThe stub label is there as an invite to any Wikipedian from the local community or the school who knows more about the school than is on the website to update the page using their personal expertise. It is not correct to delete articles just because they are currently stubs, this appears to be a summary of all the arguments to delete this page.


 * I would invite Wikipedians voting on this, and all schools in VfD to look at the many succesful school articles on Wikipedia to see what can be achieved. An example quite close to home for me is the development of Adams' Grammar School--LukeSurl 00:38, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.