Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ez publishing

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:14, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Ez publishing
Advertising; no evidence that this is an encyclopedic company. CDC  (talk)  21:12, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertizing. --PrologFan 21:23, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, agreed. Gwk 21:26, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, I specifically wrote this article to be included on the List of U.S. Companies. There are a fairly wide variety of companies on this list, some of which are not famous. Why do you favor large corporations over small businesses for listing? We are a U.S. company. That seems to be the criteria. Thanks. manatee123
 * I kindly suggest you read What Wikipedia is not. Gwk 21:46, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - advert. Manatee, just being a company is not enough; you need to do something notable. Naturenet | Talk 21:43, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Many if not most of the companies on the list have only one notable thing about them: they are large corporations. Frankly, most are quite uninteresting. Only a very small number of the companies on the list have actually done something notable (e.g., Apple). Thanks. manatee123
 * Whether or not the list of companies has a bias in favor of large corporations, the fact is that it is Wikipedia policy to not include things that are not notable. Besides that, Wikipedia policy also does not allow advertising and the article is clearly written as if it were an advertisment. Gwk 22:27, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The article states basic facts and is less promotional than many of the current company sites taht are currently on Wikapedia. Very few of the companies that are currently on Wikapedia have done *anything* notable at all. The *only* thing they have in common is size. Most of them are large companies. This seems unfair that large companies -- boring ones at that -- get to have entries on Wikapedia, yet our small company cannot have an entry. manatee123
 * If you want to debate the policies of Wikipedia, you can do that on my talk page. As to this article, I leave it to the community to form a consensus. Gwk 23:45, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't want to debate policies but am merely saying that my page is no less in line with policies than the current entries that are cataloged in "List of United States Companies".manatee123
 * Delete. Vanity page. Can't even properly spell "wikipedia". --Vizcarra 23:52, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * I made a careless spelling error but am well aware of how to spell wikipedia. It is kind of rude to call attention to petty errors. manatee123
 * Delete, ad for non-notable company. Dcarrano 01:16, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising. JamesBurns 07:16, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, sorry Manatee, but Wikipedia is not here for you to advertise on. &mdash;Stormie 11:16, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.