Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezenhemmer Plastic Bags and Child Rearing Utensils Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Buck  ets  ofg 04:59, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Ezenhemmer Plastic Bags and Child Rearing Utensils Party

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

having 72 members and a maximum of 102 votes in a country of 9 million and a small website without it's own domain name hardly qualifys as noteible. Samuel 22:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 02:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletions.   -- SkierRMH 02:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, wikipedia is not the place to make something non-notable appear notable. This is no different than WP:NOT for things made up in school one day just because it involves grownups.- Dmz5  *Edits**Talk* 20:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I mean, is it really less notable than any of the 'political parties' on List of frivolous political parties? Aelffin 21:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I would argue that it is less notable than for instance the Donald Duck Party (which is the other Swedish entry on the List of frivolous political parties). The Ezenhemmer people got 102 votes in 1994 but only 1 vote in the 2006 election ( http://www.val.se/val/val2006/slutlig_ovrigt/handskrivet/R/index.html ). I'm afraid I can't find any results for the 1998 and 2002 elections, but it is clear that Ezenhemmer is a historical frivolous party and I can't see how that fills any definition of notability.--Bonadea 21:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.