Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezra Friedlander


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 21:05, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Ezra Friedlander

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article subject is not notable. No significant coverage from reliable sources. MirrorLockup (talk) 20:25, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin The major contributors to this article have been confirmed as a sock garden: . Also, the sockmaster re-created the article twice after it was speedily deleted.  So salting will likely be necessary if the article is deleted. MirrorLockup (talk) 15:01, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - A quick search of G-news could find nothing but mere mentions and quotes... Nothing significant enough to suffice WP:BIO concerns... I might be willing to change my mind if reliable sources show up that say he has actually done anything notable... - Adolphus79 (talk) 20:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks significant coverage of the subject in secondary sources. That he exists is easily verifiable, but he's usually getting himself quoted in newspapers and the like, which is really just trivial coverage. Ray  Talk 20:39, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete – A judge of an appellate court is at least as notable as a political consultant, but there is no article about the judge. Bwrs (talk) 01:49, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This person may be important but without in depth coverage by reliable sources an article isn't merited by WP:N. This has the side effect of weeding out uninteresting articles which just say this is the person this is his/her job. Steve Dufour (talk) 05:39, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:N or WP:BIO without significant coverage. --  At am a  頭 21:34, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. ukexpat (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.