Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ezra Wiener


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Ezra Wiener

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a one line stub about a staff member of a Jewish day school who does not meet any semblance of biographical notability on Wikipedia. Violates WP:NN, WP:BIO, and WP:NOT. IZAK 07:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions.   IZAK 07:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for above reasons. IZAK 07:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of independent sources. Nothing verifiable besides existence. --Huon 10:04, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   —David Eppstein 15:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable per WP:BIO. Where are all these coming from? ;) EyeSereneTALK 19:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, WP:RS. Any reason this wasn't prod'ed as a CSD A7 in the first place? -- MarcoTolo 03:39, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete pending further sourcing./ It asserts notability, so it wasnt a speedy, and if it had been prodded the tag would have been removed, so it's here. this is an important yeshiva high school in a region of many orthodox Jews, and the position is I think equivalent to Dean of Students/spiritual director. That's not enough to show notability, and there is no evidence presented that he is notable even within his profession and denomination. ("staff member" is a little unfair--agreed he's not head of he school, but neither is he the janitor.)DGG (talk) 04:37, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Does saying someone is "esteemed" without any further elaboration count as an assertion of notability? I'm not trying to be argumentative, I've just always thought that valid claims of WP:N required an actual statement of what made the individual/group/institution notable - "Bob Jones was an important " without support seems to me to fall in the same category as "Jim Smith is a ". Of course, the establishment of notability is based on WP:RS: I guess I'm asking the more basic question "Does a simple adjective serve to indicate an assertion of notability?" Thoughts? (and again, I'm not try to WP:WIKILAWYER, just re-examining my viewpoint). -- MarcoTolo 21:22, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Yeshivish 19:18, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.