Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F&G


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. The balance of the debate was for deletion with the argument against a merge (unsourced) winning the day. I also note that the editors of a long page Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness haven't judged this important enough to mention. I carried out a web search here and thought I had hit gold. However, in all uses except the WP entry, F&G apparently stands for 'Freaks & Geeks'! This search fared no better. TerriersFan (talk) 21:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

F&G
Delete fails WP:N.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 09:52, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into Smashing Pumpkins.  Th e Tr ans hu man ist    11:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a collection of nelogisms. STORMTRACKER    94  Go Sox! 15:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * If the origination from Smashing Pumpkins is sourced then merge/redirect to the latter, otherwise Delete per WP:NEO. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:16, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Per above.  crassic\talk 19:50, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:N. — BQZip01 —  talk 06:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Neologisms are permitted on Wikipedia (like "e-mail"); I'm tired of that argument being slapped on anything new that a user doesn't like. — BQZip01 —  talk 06:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per User:BQZip01. As brewcrewer points out, it isn't sourced. There's no reason to merge a single line of WP:OR, which then requires us to retain a useless redirect for GFDL compliance. If this information is important & necessary to the Smashing Pumpkins article, it can be added there independently. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.