Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F*X*T Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

F*X*T Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unsourced, no indication of notability. bender235 (talk) 00:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:54, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable, not yet released magazine. Eduemoni↑talk↓  01:30, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no notablity. HHaeyyn89 (talk) 07:26, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, can't see any example of notability. Dayewalker (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not meet the WP:NOTABILITY standard of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Sharksaredangerous (talk) 16:16, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.