Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fédération des associations étudiantes du campus de l'Université de Montréal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 02:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Fédération des associations étudiantes du campus de l'Université de Montréal
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Federation of student associations - no independent assertation of notability - would seem to fail WP:ORG and guidelines at UNIGUIDE CultureDrone (talk) 09:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —• Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is the main students association, and would therefore be notable, as for other major universities. it would help very much if the present inadequate article were improved to sufficiently demonstrate that. DGG (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This is no ordinary student association. The university's third provincial charter defines it as being a public institution in which students have a right to participate. This is mainly done through the FAECUM. From what I've seen, and judging from policy guidelines, the FAECUM is definitely not less notable than McGill's SSMU. The FAECUM has been involved in notable public events such as the 2005 student protest, and its historical/political role has even been subject to scholarly research . Thus I agree with DGG: the article simply needs to be expanded. --m3taphysical (talk) 16:04, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.