Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fëa and hröa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:30, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Fëa and hröa

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, all information is sourced to the book itself instead of secondary sources. --Joshualouie711talk 23:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 04:01, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Agreed, this is Wikia material that fails GNG. The article is already there and the sources from this one should be transwikied before it is deleted.ZXCVBNM (TALK) 02:46, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does wiktionary do Elvish? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.