Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F.C. PRO Romania


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

F.C. PRO Romania

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Club that plays Sunday league football in the Sceptre Sunday League, which is way, way below the level that would bring a presumption of notability. I can't find anything about this club aside from their own Facebook page and YouTube channel. Looks to be a comprehensive failure of WP:GNG. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC) It is a new team representing 1 million Romanians who live and work in the UK. The other team that we had called FC Romania progressed in 15 years form Sunday league to Isthmian league. The British bought the brand and the league position so we have got left with only this team now : FC Pro Romania.If you want to delete a page delete the FC Romania team which doesn’t represent the name it bears. It is one of the thousands of insignificant English teams owned by British at low level 7-8 .The captain and goalkeeper moved here now all the team players are Romanian. I say here because I live in Basildon. Please let this team to develop and I promise in 10-15 years they will get back to Isthmian or Southern League. Level 7-8. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maximliviu7 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Romania,  and England.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:47, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Where is your evidence that the club will be notable in 10-15 years' time? Do you have a WP:CRYSTALBALL? Would it not make more sense to create the article after the club gains significant coverage? Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - I couldn't find any references - let alone borderline ones. Nfitz (talk) 01:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 08:06, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no sources to indicate notability. Sorry article creator, you need independent sources to do news coverage on your team if you want to be considered notable by Wikipedia standards. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 16:46, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, No sign of notability. Alex-h (talk) 16:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG. In 10-15 years time if they are more successful then, like the creator suggests, then the article can be re-created. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:38, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable at all. Try again in 10-15 years -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.