Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F. Spencer Hunley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

F. Spencer Hunley
touching story -- 3 hits &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149;  00:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nn vanity. — Cuivi é  nen  , Thursday, 20 April 2006 @ 00:30 UTC 
 * Comment - Look at this edit! Anyone understands what's going on here? (I could not verify anything about the older F. Spencer Hunley.) Lambiam Talk 00:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm confused. The article was originally created about the older guy. But based on googling, everything about him is garbage. It is impossible to be an academic at that level, with published works, and a tenure as a university chancellor, and not show up on Google, but there's nothing there, not one single hit. There never was such a professor. Everything I can find that seems relevant points to a 19 or 20 year-old KC kid with autism who's active in Missouri politics. Was it a hoax and then someone else came along and repurposed the page to talk about the kid? Fan1967 01:27, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Possibly. It is also possible that the anon editor and the creator of the page are the same person, perhaps who created an account specifically to create the article and then edited it as an anonymous IP. Either way, the original content seems to be a hoax and the current content is non-notable. — Cuivi é  nen  , Thursday, 20 April 2006 @ 01:40 UTC 
 * Yes, it definitely looks like that. The page creator also created the original version of the Missouri Day article, which references the young FSH. A message I left on his talk page over a month ago asking for clarification was never answered. Delete, forth with this, forthwith! Lambiam Talk 10:49, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - nn, vain, and advocates practicing medicine without a license, too! Ronabop 02:37, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable. --P199 04:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, don't diagnose yourself. It's a bad habit. --  Samir  [[Image:Canadian maple leaf 2.jpg|20px]]  (the scope)  धर्म 04:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Ronabop and Samir (The Scope). J I P  | Talk 07:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn-bio. --Ter e nce Ong 11:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. And as for the self-diagnosis... Just zis Guy you know? 13:00, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.