Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F1 Exhaust Note


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  06:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

F1 Exhaust Note

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another one. Appears Non notable from a Google search, with a dodgy tone. Would tag A7, but not sure if this is eligible as it isn't web content... -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  08:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC) -- Mdann  52   talk to me!  08:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There is, possibly. Since this game little popular or something, it went through a pressure that talks about the F1 racing event. Although, it's not officially licensed to F1 Association for this game alone much else. I searched it from Google and System16, the arcade encyclopedia that was friendly, can be found |here as well as, IT'S INFORMATIVE. So, there you have it. --The Game Expert  (talk) 15:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Update: A while ago, I'd upload some pictures that it was taken in other websites for this game to create more signs of an article. And yes, it was very successful, since Thrill Drive. Later, I'll gonna put more pictures that are safe and non-violatable. So, that's my comment. If you want to share your comment, then that's should be fine if you have on your minds. Thanks!!! --The Game Expert  (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 19:25, 26 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Nothing there is both significant coverage and reliable sources. I thought for a while that the Killer List of Videogames was - but unfortunately, re-checking both the Wikipedia entry and their acceptable use policy the content appears to be user-submitted.  As I said for the F1 Superlap discussion, we need in depth coverage in reliable sources.  And there doesn't appear to be any. Delete as of now with a hope that there's something like magazines from when the game was actually current. Neonchameleon (talk) 03:08, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
 * There is consensus for Killer List of Videogames to be considered a reliable source for Arcade games and it has been used in FAs. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  13:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. That's one source.  One more needed. Neonchameleon (talk) 11:39, 31 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep the change. There are magazine reviews about this game. And I'd recently advised that you should look at the CVG Magazine review. Those magazine reviews about this game can be seen on System16 where they found out of those... And look for google images about this. --The Game Expert  (talk) 08:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is the only review listed by System 16 (as mentioned above by Game Expert), and appears to be the most in-depth coverage the game has received, which really isn't saying much. There is a page on SegaRetro (also a wiki), which has very little information.  It seems there is little if any potential for this article beyond a basic description of the game's properties - to my mind, the game does not satisfy general notability. --quantumobserver position momentum entanglements 21:58, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * No deletion and keep, for one thing. I'd add one more exterminal link that it would like to have notability and so on. And yes, just one thing, there's a trivia from Micheal Jackson ( Well, we know that he died already in the past years and he's one of the most entertaining and most superb singer of the world, in the Black American culture.), he owned this game much and recently to be played always. By the next years, his dedicated machine was already exhibited or sold from Micheal Jackson's Auction at April 4, 2009. That's one of it. I'll add more if I can catch up there. --The Game Expert  (talk) 04:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep: per the The Game Expert. - Ret.Prof (talk) 15:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * For the last discussion. Later on, I'll notably finish the AfD or Articles for Deletion discussion for this article. For those Wikipedia user who are not yet been added to this topic and who are interested to this game, for 2 days, I would close the discussion insteadly and I'll gonna get the result of this article to be nominated as a readable article without speedy deletions at the moment. And there's no need to get well-explained why this article should be closed in AfD. --The Game Expert  (talk) 09:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You have written the article, contributed to the discussion and are not an Administrator. Therefore, you are not really able to Close it. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  13:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.