Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F1 Super Lap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The policy based argumets favor deletion Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  07:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

F1 Super Lap

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears non-notable. Would go for A7, but video games don't seem to fall under it -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  08:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:22, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No sources to prove notability.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Tritario (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 
 * Leave as is. Just added some sources. Game is notable, many videos feature this arcade game, and quite a few websites also mention this game.
 * I'm sure that there is. As of this update, there are still needed to add like the picture/s ( Although, I should be auto-confirmed for 4 days, but not yet, atleast I got more than 10 edits.) and some other stuffs, so, for now, I'll gonna add the links from Youtube, the free-video website. --The Game Expert  (talk) 15:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 16:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)


 * You are aware that Youtube is not generally considered a Reliable Source? Google finds me youtube and a handful of forums and blogs - delete unless someone can find reviews for this from the early 90s. Neonchameleon (talk) 01:12, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sure but don't take it slightly. Yeah, I know, but I would like to stay those exterminal links of Youtube and there's nothing to be done and it would be like to be a lousy performance to create more and more links around the web. No expectated issues around this article. It was a reliable source, formely the original one. Sorry and I won't give the reviews, but a good news, you can find this website: . --The Game Expert  (talk) 12:06, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You need significant coverage - a column long or so. All that page tells me is that the game existed.  Literally none of the sources produced so far that aren't Youtube have anything more than a couple of sentences.  You need something like an entire column to show significant coverage.  Also that you could create more and more links on the web is why Wikipedia has the wp:RS standard; random web pages that anyone could create aren't good enough precisely because anyone could create them. Neonchameleon (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 03:59, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I'll add more exterminal links to this article for more information and I would have much more detailed informations later on while I'm doing some stuffs there in this related article. --The Game Expert  (talk) 05:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I add more exterminal links to this article. So, you may tell me if you can as you would update the page, if I can do it properly as much. Again, much like in F1 Exhaust Note, through AfD discussion, I would nominately close this discussion page, resulting to a safe reading of an article, if Wikipedians doesn't have updated list or writings to this article ( F1 Super Lap ). Please feel free to write something to update, or else, I will close this AfD discussion in 2 days later. --The Game Expert  (talk) 09:23, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * A few comments on the links. The last three (YouTube) do not sow notability. The mamedev one appears to say about it being moved over to the MAME platform, and not about the game in detail (so borderline). The arcade-history one redirects me to the sites homepage, and the last one looks fairly good. Overall, there is only one reasonably good source on the article. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  13:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Wait, what's the upcoming updates? Well, I recently like to close this article ( Note: I don't like too much vandalism to this article; but I want some news now and yes, I'm not yet an Admin. sadly.) and I must re-update the pictures also, if I have to do that too. Well, please keep updating much else, ok? Have a God Bless! --The Game Expert  (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.