Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FA-78-1 Gundam Full Armor Type


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge with Mobile Suit Variations. Being lazy and all, I am only redirecting, keeping the original content underneath, and the edit history available for merging at any editors discretion. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

FA-78-1 Gundam Full Armor Type

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 18:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mobile Suit Variations. MythSearchertalk 18:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Mythsearcher. Edward321 (talk) 23:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Mergeto List of Gundams of the UC timeline or List of Gundams of the UC One Year War era 70.55.200.131 (talk) 06:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * List of Gundam Universal Century mobile units is already quite large, as the UC timeline is quite large. May I suggest a better merge target, such as List of (series) mobile units (where "(series)" is the name of the series, as this is copypasta as your !vote)? 208.245.87.2 (talk) 15:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yet another non notable fictional weapon. -- nips (talk) 19:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fictional weaponcruft, only notable in-universe if there. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:34, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * comment if it is related to the in-universe part, than a merge is way better than a delete. MythSearchertalk 16:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.