Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FACT150


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

FACT150

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Company does not appear to meet notability criteria - the connection with Puerto Rico may give it sufficient notability as a 'first', but the reference provided has no apparent connection with the company and therefore doesn't verify the claim. CultureDrone (talk) 09:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, for some bizarre reason, there are no digital versions of local newspapers and magazines in Puerto RIco except one which is in Spanish, will scans work for this article? (Zenmente (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2009 (UTC))
 * Sources don't have to be digital. If you use WP:CITET and give all the required information you should be okay. (Keep the scans at hand, they might help in convincing some people the sources exist) - Mgm|(talk) 13:02, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks while I prepare for this (Zenmente (talk) 13:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC))


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Coverage does not seem to be very substantial, but i have to rely here one the currently added cites, which include one press release and one college magazine.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Probably keep, this company's client list might be a good source for documentation. --Mr Accountable (talk) 06:17, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Foxy Loxy  Pounce! 01:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. While mine may not be the best reasoning, I just feel that any ostensible company engaged in "building digital intelligence" should have a functional website.  Un  sch  ool  02:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * What in the world does "building digital intelligence" mean? •••Life of Riley (T–C) 23:06, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Damned if I know. If I recall it was just something that they had on the one page of their website that I was able to open.   Un  sch  ool  00:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.