Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FAP 1842RBDT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — ξ xplicit  01:47, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

FAP 1842RBDT

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I found no coverage for this truck. SL93 (talk) 23:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete While every individiual model of motor vechicle is notable enough for an article, that assumes the presence of reliable sources that verify its existance, which I cannot do. I'm not quite ready to tag it for Speedy G3 as a hoax, but I cannot verify that this make and model exists (and, if it does, it's likely a subtype of the FAP 1840, and would be covered under its article if such is ever created). - The Bushranger One ping only 02:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is every model of motor vehicle notable? If there aren't even independent sources to verify its existence, just an entry in the manufacturer's product listings, there's no way it passes the GNG. As an aside, in the photo it actually looks like a rebadged MAN F2000, although the photos of other FAPs in the main article seem to have Mercedes SK cabs... bobrayner (talk) 20:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * In fact, should we consider any unique motor vehicle model notable by default? Even if the factory built it like lego from a MAN cab, Mercedes engine and axles, ZF transmission, ...? bobrayner (talk) 20:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * In those cases, they'd be merged to a manufacturer's or model-line article, I'd imagine. But long-standing consensus achieved through editing (and, in the latter case at least, AfDs, I'm not as familiar with car AfDs) has established that car models and aircraft models that can be verified as being truly independent types through reliable sources are notable. - The Bushranger One ping only 16:28, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * DElete -- I might have said "merge" to Fabrika automobila Priboj, which makes it, but that article is currently no more than a list of model numbers. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.