Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FCEUX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No consensus for deletion, leaning towards keep. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  12:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

FCEUX

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insignificant NES emulator. No evidence of notability over others. Beerest355 Talk 23:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete: No significant coverage for this software. SL93 (talk) 03:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - I do see coverage in multiple RSes (e.g. GameSetWatch, Kotaku, Kotaku, etc.). I guess the question of notability turns on whether or not this is significant coverage. Certainly sources like these cover FCEUX through a large proportion of the source article, but then again the source articles are pretty small. I tend to !vote keep for topics like this that are of borderline notability. -Thibbs (talk) 11:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  01:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Per comment by Thibbs.Besides,I think this can be considered as significant coverage. L smll  10:37, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.