Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FCP Euro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Sent to draft space for User:Alex at FCPEuro to work on. Since a version already existed at Draft:FCP Euro, I have named this draft Draft:FCP Euro/alt. The creator is invited to merge the versions. Bishonen &#124; talk 03:53, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

FCP Euro

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, does not meet WP:COMPANY. Purely WP:SOAPBOX and uses only WP:PRIMARY sources and company-penned press releases for sources. Edited by a company employee and an outside party assisting them. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 16:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC) Changing my initial vote to draft, see below. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:48, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. Kleuske (talk) 18:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This is a company brochure, not an encyclopedia article. - Bri (talk) 21:06, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Draft As an editor to this page, I'd like to request this page not be deleted. I have already created the draft page, but before this one meets its fate, I have several lawsuit cases in CT that I could add to the article. I know that is nothing of significance, but it is much better than the brochure-like content already on the page. The lawsuits have to do with BMW and VOLVO specifically which are two major automotive companies. What are your thoughts everyone? Also, we have several publications completed about us in Roundel by BMW Car Club of America but none of those are on the web. They are just paper publications.Alex at FCPEuro (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Printed sources are valid as well if they're considered reliable. Check the citation templates cite magazine and cite news for some of the parameters you can supply.
 * To the other commenters - based on my correspondence with this individual, I'm changing my initial deletion nomination to Draft. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Draftify - no harm in moving this to draft space. I would suggest to the editor to avail themselves of the Articles for Creation process.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.