Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FC Universitatea Craiova Notable former players


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the move request was: not to delete Fasach Nua (talk) 19:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

FC Universitatea Craiova Notable former players

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Strange page no criteria for inclusion or exclusion, no references, no point Fasach Nua (talk) 03:15, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:23, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - article needs improving, not deleting. Rename to List of FC Universitatea Craiova players, add some references, and voila - a decent article as per the standard found at . GiantSnowman 14:26, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The article as it currently stands is just a random text-dump of players' names, though, with nothing to indicate their reason for inclusion, a million miles away from the likes of List of Arsenal F.C. players. Heck, quite a few entries don't even identify the player's full name!  I'd suggest the article needs to be deleted and then if someone fancies creating a properly formatted List of FC Universitatea Craiova players, with clear inclusion criteria, they can start it from scratch -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:51, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:LISTCRUFT, without prejudice to recreation with clear inclusion criteria. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment It's worth keeping considering this is one of Romania's bigger club sides. I'll have a crack at cleaning up the list and giving it some inclusion criteria. J Mo 101 (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Update: Standardised the list. Removed players who didn't fit the criteria. Should be keepable now anyway. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:26, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I would suggest the pages is moved to a title which reflects the current content Fasach Nua (talk) 13:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Already moved to the conventional naming for these sort of lists. (eg. the Arsenal example above and also List of FC Steaua Bucureşti players) J Mo 101 (talk) 17:09, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You have done a sterling job turning this into something worth keeping, however my feeling is that the article name lacks precision Fasach Nua (talk) 17:38, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * How so? The name seems pretty unambiguous to me. The criteria of that policy also includes consistency, hence why I've named it the way that 99% of other lists of this kind are done. J Mo 101 (talk) 19:07, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If I went to an article called "List of FC Universitatea Craiova players" I would expect to find a list of FC Universitatea Craiova players, not a list that contained a subset of the players of FC Universitatea Craiova that had played more than 100 games. Have any of the other articles you linked gone through a quality process such as WP:GA or preferably WP:FA? Fasach Nua (talk) 19:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quite a few. These two articles are a couple of examples. J Mo 101 (talk) 19:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I guess that's that then Fasach Nua (talk) 19:57, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * keep as nominator, I have seen significant improvement in this article making it worthy of inclusion in wp Fasach Nua (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * If Sir Sputnik is happy to retract his delete !vote, I'll close this as nom withdrawn..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Go right ahead. I'm satisfied as well that it meets the necessary criteria for player lists. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.