Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FEUP

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 18:27, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)

FEUP
Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto.

Discussion moved from Pages needing translation into English: Portuguese, might be a copyvio from. --TenOfAllTrades 02:47, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, that page says, "© Copyright 2004, Departamento de Engenharia de Minas. Cópia literal e distribuição desta página na íntegra são permitidas em qualquer meio, desde que este aviso seja preservado," which I believe means that we could copy the page, as long as we preserve their copyright notice. I'm not sure how that works for us: it speaks of copying, but not of derived work. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:49, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * I think it says that unmodified copies of the page are allowed so long as the copyright message is preserved. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 16:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Google translator says "© Copyright 2004, Department of Engineering of Mines. Literal copy and distribution of this page in the complete one are allowed in any way, since that this acknowledgment is preserved." &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 16:31, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * As I said: the problem is, that it doesn't say anything about derived work, and once it's in Wikipedia, we have to be free to modify it. I think we should just delete it and if someone wants to do the topic they should start from an unencumbered text. -- Jmabel | Talk 17:54, Feb 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * The expression cópia literal means "verbatim copy". I believe it rules out changing the text. JoaoRicardo 21:05, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Maybe this should be handeled on WP:CP instead? I don't really care. Basically, this is legal for us to use unmodified, but encumbered with restrictions that make it unsuitable for Wikipedia. And the topic is only marginally encyclopedic. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:37, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Conflict with copyright restrictions of wikipedia.  RJFJR 02:44, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * DElete--ZayZayEM 02:46, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous statements. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsuitable for Wikipedia since we cannot change it. JoaoRicardo 06:49, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.