Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FFT Clan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 23:16, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

FFT Clan
It's a twofer - Clancruft *and* bandcruft all in one. Band has no releases and the clan has 116 Googles. Nuke it. FCYTravis 01:02, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Pound with asteroids YixilTesiphon Say helloBe shallow 04:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * They say the FFT stands for Final Fantasy Tactics, but I'm not buying it ... I think it stands for Fast Fourier Transform. Either way, delete!!  --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 06:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - cruftilicious. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:45, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, vanity. The JPS 10:34, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Band fails WP:MUSIC (especially with hits that didn't chart), and gaming clans are otherwise non-remarkable. - Mgm|(talk) 10:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - the band has never released a song, and I don't see any evidence that the clan has ever competed in any organised tournament (which is after all what clans are supposed to do. I believe that clan articles are wikipedia-worthy, but only if they do what clans are actually suppose to do e.g. have competed in the CPL or other tournament which itself had a wikipedia article. Cynical 20:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete concur with Cynical's reasoning. Well said! --Habap 20:43, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Krich 00:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete with a suggestion that we re-think the rules of WP:MUSIC about what qualifies as a "half hour broadcast on a national radio" network, with maybe adding some notation or explanation that podcasting, and self-published internet radio, are problematic. Ronabop 09:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, off we go. Stifle 10:23, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.