Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FHM 100 Sexiest Women in the World 1995

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. FCYTravis 09:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

FHM 100 Sexiest Women in the World 1995
As per VfD nomination for 40 Most Awesomely Bad Breakup Songs on 7/30, this is one in a series of non-encyclopedic FHM subjective listings. To be consistent, this should also be deleted. Based on discussion I plan to nominate the others in the list. Thanks. :) RJH 15:22, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable list from a notable magazine.Gateman1997 21:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable - WP:POINT (don't disrupt the enyclopedia to make a point). --OntarioQuizzer 21:55, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV is POV. Besides, it was FHM's employees, not its management, who voted on this list, ie, just another group of non-notable people. I don't think this list has any enyclopedic value at all. Denni &#9775; 22:12, 2005 August 1 (UTC)
 * Keep, it isn't POV to say 'this is what FHM said', that is a verifiable (if fairly uninteresting) fact. --Doc (?) 23:27, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it sexy.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Democracy, Whiskey, Sexy Klonimus 03:09, 2 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Okay well then I'm confused, and somewhat bemused. The vote is overwhelmingly to keep Sexiest Women but overwhelmingly to delete the Awesomely Bad list. Yet they are essentially the same type of list &mdash; a commercial editorial categorization. This is completely inconsistent, to say the least. Was it because one list was posted on a Saturday, perhaps? Maybe the voters don't get cable but do subscribe to FHM. &mdash; RJH
 * That wouldn't surprise me if that's the case... the overwhelming majority of Wikipedians do appear to be male.Gateman1997 17:11, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - grubber
 * Keep notable list. JamesBurns 03:32, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.