Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIA Masters Historic Formula One Championship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was split decision. No consensus on the main article and delete on the season articles. Both relist did not yield additional input, so a third did not seem to be helpful. It may be worth nominating just the main article by itself in the future to try to come to a better consensus about its inclusion on Wikipedia and to do a full source analysis. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

FIA Masters Historic Formula One Championship

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG. A WP:BEFORE check yields no WP:SIGCOV, almost exclusively passing mentions with the occasional WP:ROUTINE news article. Tagged with WP:V issues for almost nine and a half years. Wikipedia is not a database. - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"   17:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they are subpages to this article:
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Motorsport,  and Europe.  - "Ghost  of  Dan Gurney"   17:30, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"   17:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * - "Ghost of  Dan Gurney"   17:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Relisting comment: There's a clear Delete on the season articles but not much feedback on the main page up for review. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete 2016 and 2017 season articles as they clearly don't meet WP:GNG or WP:NSEASONS. I will double check the general event article to see if more sources do exist for it, but if people don't find any, then that article should be deleted too. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete season articles, but leaning keep on main article - I believe I have seen coverage of the broader series (but not individual seasons) in print sources, though I do not currently have access to them, and online searches produce so many false positive results (ie. "Charles Leclerc takes historic victory in Formula One race") that it's extremely difficult to determine what online coverage might exist of this series, with this Motor Sport magazine article being the only thing a quick search could find in the mess. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 05:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep and re-nominate separately due to varying levels of notability. The season articles are likely candidates to be deleted per WP:NSEASON and WP:GNG, though possibly WP:SIGCOV exists on the series as a whole per user:HumanBodyPiloter5’s analysis.  Bundled nominations should be avoided in these cases as many users will employ an WP:ALLORNOTHING approach.  Frank   Anchor  15:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete season articles definitely. The main article itself is still so threadbare on information even after a decade (it honestly ought to be nominated itself) that it renders those articles completely irrelevant. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  16:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:NSEASONS has no bearing on these articles as that is a notability guideline for team season articles (eg 2022 Geelong Football Club season). I agree with others that the season articles should have been nominated separately, however. A7V2 (talk) 00:38, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.