Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA 09


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete (note that I am not the deleting admin). Sr13 04:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

FIFA 09

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Complete Crystal-ballery - FIFA 08 isn't even out for several months yet. Prod template removed by anon IP without edit summary fchd 18:03, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL. Short article with absolutely no content: the fact that there will be a 2009 version of a major EA franchise goes without saying. It's one of the fundamental facts of life: we will all die at some point and there will always be another EA title. ;) And the second sentence is most likely not even correct since '08 is slated to come out for all three consoles. Stands to reason that '09 will as well but, hey, that's precisely the reason why the have WP:CRYSTAL. I also have a feeling that this is going to more or less snowball. -- Seed 2.0 18:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:CRYSTAL with no content whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 18:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete OR and no RS. the_undertow talk  22:16, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless EA has officially announced the game, there's no need to keep the article here. --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  06:41, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CFD:A1/A3 (added db-empty on article page) // laughing man 20:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There was once content here... so not really a speedy. Of course I'm just delaying the inevitable deletion that will happen when this AfD closes tomorrow...--Isotope23 20:42, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It is a speedy, my reason for speedy was (in bold) - It is a very short article providing little or no context (CSD A1), contains no content whatsoever (CSD A3), consists only of links elsewhere (CSD A3) or a rephrasing of the title (CSD A3). // laughing man 20:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - as original nominator, I didn't think it was (or indeed is) a Speedy, I coulndn't justify anything of those reasons. - fchd 21:06, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
 * or please wait another 24 hours, and then delete the article.  Why delay the inevitable and waste our time discussing it further. // laughing man 02:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.