Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIFA Classic Clubs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 17:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

FIFA Classic Clubs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Looks like a copy of the given source without the coat of arms. The Banner talk 21:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

--

Hi

Well, yes I listed all clubs mentioned as classic by FIFA official website. I did it because i red about beeing a classic club in some wiki articles (like Club Atlético San Lorenzo article). So, I googled it to see what was it, then I created the article and linked to clubs considered classics by FIFA (I didn't finish with that). It's also similar to this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFA_Player_of_the_Century which is pretty much a list too !

But if you think this is not worthy in wikipedia it's ok to me. I just wanted to add cool info.

Sorry for my english. User talk:Wikipediow 21:38, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * You should add independent sources as only they can determine the notability of this list. And you should try to fix the internal links as the article has 23 links to disambiguation pages, like the link to Ajax. The Banner talk 21:43, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

--

Hi again

I'm fixing internal links right now and I will look some info to add.

Give me some time before you decide to delete.

User talk:Wikipediow 21:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

--

Hi

I fixed all desambiguation links in every team. Also added and referenced a book that lists clubs considered as classic. User talk:Wikipediow 22:07, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 4 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can see no encyclopedic value in this list -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:22, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - wholly non-notable WP:LISTCRUFT. GiantSnowman 10:05, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Listcruft. Fenix down (talk) 14:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.