Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FILMLOKA


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

FILMLOKA

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Underreferenced company that shows no signs of meeting WP:GNG. 2 of 3 refs are to the company's own site. Page is also barely skirting copyright, it's a closely paraphrased copy of the about page https://sites.google.com/view/filmloka/about. It's also a rejected draft Draft:FILMLOKA. Only other edits by this editor are about the studio's head, so possible COI/promo issues. JamesG5 (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:16, 12 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete as it seems WP:TOOSOON for an article about a company that has only produced one film, also no sighn of passing WP:CORPDEPTH, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:59, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete'. As far as I understand, this production company has yet to produce a film. The article says that a 2020 film is in preparation but the cast is TBA so the project is still in its early days. Clearly fails WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 22:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.