Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FIPADL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 21:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

FIPADL

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete unsourced nn theory attributed to nn person about how to analyze common law cases. Everyone can have a theory, but this has no demonstration of notability nor does its alleged proponent. Carlossuarez46 20:28, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as Wikipedia is not for things made up (in school) one day.
 * Delete Nice as a teaching tool, but ultimately unencyclopedic and NN. &mdash;   Music  Maker  5376  03:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, not sourced. Neozoon 20:57, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Bearian 23:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.