Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FLAVORx


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

FLAVORx

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing at all actually convincing of any applicable solid independent notability and improvements, I simply found a few expected coverage links....Nothing else convincingly better. I also should note I myself noticed this was actually accepted in November 2011, which I would not have considering the current appearance. SwisterTwister  talk  06:22, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. No reliable sources. Tom29739 [ talk ] 23:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC). Keep. After looking at the improvements to the article that User:Sam Sailor made, I have decided to change my vote to keep. Tom29739 [ talk ] 23:02, 16 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Question You spend two minutes on a mobile device before sharing your opinion. Which parts of WP:BEFORE did you perform? Sam Sailor Talk! 16:54, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:BEFORE doesn't apply, and the article did not have any reliable sources. Also, why does it matter that I was using a mobile to perform the edit? Using a mobile doesn't affect my ability to comment on AfDs. Tom29739 [ talk ] 17:32, 16 May 2016 (UTC).
 * Since my question was replied to with WP:BEFORE doesn't apply I believe we can assume that no due diligence was performed. Please note WP:NRVE. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * I have begun referencing the article, and I ask for an hour or so per WP:HEYMANN to see what it brings. May I ask the debate not be closed in the meantime? Thank you. Sam Sailor Talk! 16:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Twenty+ year old company, the quote "leader in flavorings for medicines" and widely mentioned in medical literature. I have added c. 15 Cite books, see below for a selection, but you could go on and on. Sam Sailor Talk! 18:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:HEY and Sam Sailor's nice improvements. The refs found by Sam Sailor above show quite a few independent reliable sources for the company and its products. The article has incorporated some of these and is now a well-cited stub. A topic satisfying WP:GNG through multiple reliable sources and an article that looks fairly neutral with well-cited content suggests keeping the article. --Mark viking (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - the article needed improvements with respect to sources to verify the information and notability. Its formatting which has addressed makes it a better article too which doesn't deserve deletion. Irakakiku (talk) 09:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.