Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FLEEK


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence of this article's subject being given significant coverage in reliable sources has been presented by those asking for its retention; therefore, this article's subject is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 06:49, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

FLEEK

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very new musician who appears to fail wp:music. Except for one source about him getting a grant, all the others seem to be links to his work. Google does not turn up anything much better. Perhaps in a few years. Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 06:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 06:52, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 06:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as none of this suggests a better notable article yet. SwisterTwister   talk  20:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears better notable articles have been included. Reference; Encyclopedia of Film Composers by Thomas S. Hischak, The New Biographical Dictionary of Film: Sixth Edition, and The Cosmic Compendium by Rupert W Anderson. Jpedilla (talk) 9:05, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * These seem to be bare mentions (ie the source is actually about other people, but then he is mentionned as being involved, most often as director). I don't know if directors are often considered notable based on this. However, if so, we seriously need to trim the article down to his role as a director. His music career is far from notable. Happy Squirrel (talk) 02:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The Article has been meticulously trimmed down. FocusInRegard (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — foxj 13:03, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - while there are a ton of hits, they are not about this subject. Can't find enough in-depth coverage from reliable independent sources to show they pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:30, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per HappySquirrel and onel5969. Does not appear to pass GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsharpminor (talk • contribs) 20:41, 20 January 2016‎


 * Keep Vevo Reference of FLEEK is Clear. It is Legally Binding with Universal Music Group. Whether not this needs more reference, is unclear, for the word for the name is also from a popular slang word. Overall, passes minimal general GNG. CalabJessika (talk) 09:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable musician.The Cross Bearer (talk) 19:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks Notable to me, as compared to other pages I've seen. Agree to Jessika Talk. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaintNickEschling (talk • contribs) 04:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.