Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FNPower100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 04:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

FNPower100

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Listcruft - very few of the people listed have articles. Could also be considered a copyvio from Footwear News. &mdash; RHaworth 03:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 23:12, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - no secondary sources, meaning no evidence of notability. (i.e. no evidence that anyone except Footwear News - the publisher of the list - thinks this list is notable). Peter Ballard (talk) 00:46, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Since Footwear News itself is a redlink, I doubt that this list deserves an article. Glass  Cobra  17:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.