Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FN P90 in popular culture (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was kept. Please don't make spurious AfD nominations in order to prove a point. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 08:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

FN P90 in popular culture
According to A Man In Black, is nothing but trivia -- Y&#124;yukichigai 00:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

As I am not the one who has the biggest problem with the article, I cannot properly elaborate on the reasons. I will leave that up to A Man In Black. -- Y&#124;yukichigai 00:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * see also Articles_for_deletion/FIM-92_Stinger_in_popular_culture - Yomangani talk 00:48, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't see why this is at AFD. I merged the encyclopedic prose (which is useful) and redirected it. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply - Because the bulk of the existing data in the article was deleted in the process of that merge. As the article has been reverted numerous times prior to my intervention, I found it evident that the article's merging/deletion was of sufficient controversy to warrant an AfD discussion. -- Y&#124;yukichigai 01:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * It was replaced with (already-extant) summary prose. This happens all the time, and doesn't need to go to AFD. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - suggest a speedy close - nomination seems to be WP:POINT after a disputed merge. AFD is not for content disputes. Yomangani talk 01:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Reply - this is not an instance of WP:POINT. Frankly I have very little interest in the outcome one way or the other, as AMIB's merge seems to be, for the most part anyway, justified.  I simply wish to, well, "do this the right way", rather than cutting people out of the process and pissing them off. -- Y&#124;yukichigai 01:12, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * In that case, tag it with merge tags and have the discussion on the article's talk page. This isn't "the right way". Yomangani talk 01:14, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.