Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FOI Online Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 06:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

FOI Online Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Online awards of no known notability. Can't find any secondary or tertiary sources considering it notable. Fails WP:GNG. Awards have to be notable, not the recipients to whom they are thrown at. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Strong Support for Deletion: This article has zero notability and it should be deleted immediately. Krish |  Talk  07:36, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Organizer's Speak: The organizers of awards are least bothered for its 'notable' work and event management to be questioned on such platform, where unsuitable and probably biased users find it 'not notable'. Congratulations users, you have done a very 'notable' task by doing this, you showed what a 'notable' examiners you are. Sources can't be created for users like you, who destroys the very first step of creation. The award organizers already have much respect and lot of public appreciation being one of the most renowned film institute in India, who itself have many people from Bollywood and South Indian film industries and whom you might have already edited on Wikipedia platform. We are happy with the response we received on our personal portal, and have least interest whether you delete the article or not, it doesn't harms our need. Public voting for our first edition is a massive success and probably the event too. You keep copying, pasting and cutting, that's what you 'notable' users are meant for!61.12.32.76 (talk) 11:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now perhaps as this is questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  03:14, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Do not delete until its Announcement: The article has now been included in WikiProject Film, WikiProject India and WikiProject Awards and prizes. The topic is gaining importance on social media too. Question on its notability is doubtful at the moment. Deletion might be avoided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.12.32.76 (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * What happened to the "[we] have least interest whether you delete the article or not" speech? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)




 * Delete per failing WP:ORG. This is a brand new deal and no one is speaking about it except themselves. If this every gets some meadia coverage, the topic might e reconsidered.  Schmidt,  Michael Q.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.