Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FOTGR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 18:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

FOTGR
Currently rather POV and unencyclopaedic in tone (which is fixable) article about an organisation which appears to be not in any way notable. Most Google hits on FOTGR are for cameras, once those are excluded the number of hits on FOTGR is below 300, and even those are often not about this project. Might (just) be justifiable with reference to systemic bias, I've voted keep on that basis before now, but I really don't see that in this case. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 10:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Sounds like a nice bunch of people, but the article has not established notability in any way. Delete. &mdash; HorsePunchKid &rarr;&#x9F9C; 2005-12-10 10:03:03Z
 * Delete as nomination --Mecanismo 12:39, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree, Delete is the way to go. --Agamemnon2 13:17, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve Several projects on the go, representatives in three countries (though that may just mean there is one guy in Dubai and one in Saudi Arabia), registered with government and should be verifiable. It's hard to judge an Indian organisation by web presence in comparison with US organisations so it might well be worth keeping. --Spondoolicks 14:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.