Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FRF.12


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Frame Relay (non-admin closure). The material seems to have already been merged, but the history will still be accessible if needed. I do not expect anyone to disagree with the "#FRF.12" targeting that Mark Viking suggested, but if so, feel free to list it at WP:RFD. Tigraan Click here to contact me 16:38, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

FRF.12

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominated for PROD and also MERGE with Frame Relay before nominator of merge apparently changed their mind and wanted to keep the article. The article has never cited any sources. In the merge discussion, four sources were found, all primary (Cisco) sources; still no reliable secondary sources appear to exist. The technology is an offshoot of the Frame Relay technology. I am moving the few sentences from this article into the Frame Relay article. That leaves this one to be deleted. —Prhartcom ♥ 14:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Soft delete (redirect). I hope we can speedy close this; there is a pretty clear fail as far as being an encyclopedic topic is concerned. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment I've added 5 sources based on those given in the Frame Relay article and the talk pages. Three Cisco, two non-Cisco. As this is part of a Frame Relay Forum standard agreed upon by multiple manufacturers, it is not clear to me that Cisco is a primary reference. I want to search a bit more before making a recommendation. --Mark viking (talk) 18:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Frame Relay like nominator started. This is not an off-shoot of frame relay but actually part of it. Also, the Cisco references are secondary references, not primary. DeVerm (talk) 21:17, 17 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge to Frame Relay. There looks to be enough secondary sourcing in the article to make this topic nominally notable. But merging the material into Frame Relay article gives it better context for the readers. Until someone builds a Frame Relay Forum article describing the various parts of the standard, Frame Relay is the best place for it. --Mark viking (talk) 04:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Frame relay. Material was merged there by . Nomination for deletion seems like an unnecessary extra step in this case. ~Kvng (talk) 14:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Frame Relay. This seems to be the best option per AfD nom. I have to say that it appears to me that Cisco refs #1 and #3 should be considered as primary and the blog (#2) probably not. The agreement, I am not sure - primary or secondary? --- Steve Quinn (talk) 04:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.